This week, I was going to write about the results of my November wardrobe experiment which ended yesterday, but I came across these musings from author Colin Wright and I thought it important to share them. Colin presents a means of looking at the world's current social and political situation in a way that, at least to me, was both novel and insightful.
I hope you enjoy reading his thoughts and that his words can help provide some clarity during increasingly turbulent times.
"One of the major challenges we face as an increasingly interconnected, globe-straddling species, is in how we organize ourselves even as our traditional distinctions dissipate.
It's easy to look around at the surging waves of nationalism and assume that this isn't an issue; we've clearly got our distinctions firmly in place. But a lot of what's happening today is a reflexive, unaimed mule-kick at a perceived attacker that's whittled away at our borders, our cultural identities, and our sense of geographic communities for decades. We were already knocking down walls leading up to the age of the microchip and fiberoptic cables, but the internet revolution, followed by the mobile internet revolution, blasted what was left of those walls into dust.
So now we see the inevitable, knee-jerk pushback against these perceived incursions; but this is most likely just a moment, not a new reality. The bigger picture, the larger wave, is one of new awareness and fewer divisions. We have just as many labels as we've always had, but we're also more knowledgable about people who wear different labels than we do. And with that knowledge comes a slow, certain expansion of our communication channels and interactions.
There's still a chance that what's happening in China, and increasingly in places like Russia, will spread farther and wider. Government lock-downs don't prevent the spread of information, but they do control the mainstream storyline. This has certain benefits for those in power, and can result in new, invisible, cyber-walls—but in the long-term, those, too, are likely to fall to the erosion of cultural tides, and the explosive attentions of digital sappers.
The aforementioned challenge of organization, then, is the somewhat unnoticed but very real next-step issue we'll have to face.
When conventions shift and traditions seem less and less relevant to each new generation, how do new communities coalesce?
Or in more practical terms: when neighborhoods cease to be unified, when neighbors seldom even know each other by name because our connections, our most important relationships are expansive and far-flung, no longer limited by geography; who are our neighbors? Who do we turn to when something goes wrong? What brings us together and gives us something to rally around?
For some people the obvious answer will be the communities that share their faith. For others it will be groups of people with whom they share some other ideology or hobby. Maybe your local board gaming club will be as close to a family as you've ever had beyond your circle of blood relatives.
But it seems to me that very often we leave a lot of potential community-building opportunities on the table. We look for obvious labels, shared in-group affiliations, rather than expanding our scope and considering what we actually hope to accomplish.
Consider that your local Secular Humanist group might share a lot of common ground with your local Christian Youth group.
Perhaps their ideas about how the universe was created differs. Perhaps they have conflicting ideas about prayer and science and politics.
But both of these groups may see the value in helping homeless people in their community. Perhaps both groups have a tradition of working at the local soup kitchen on holidays, and contributing to charities that provide food to the homeless on a more regular basis.
There are many differences between these two groups, but in this instance, at least, there's sufficient commonality that they could probably amplify their efforts if they worked together in some way. They might even benefit from each other's insights on the matter, though simply adding more hands, more wallets, to their efforts would be enough.
One of the major issues contributing to the current wave of cultural sequestration, of unhealthy tribalism, is that we see ourselves walking along a particular path, toward concrete milestones and goals, and we identify ourselves based on the path; the exact placement of each foot. And we do this to the exclusion of anyone else who might be headed in the same direction, aiming at the same or similar goals and milestones, because they didn't arrive there via the exact same path as us. They maybe took a more meandering route, or came at it from a different direction.
They want to feed the hungry because their faith prescribes it, and you want to feed the hungry because you believe doing is a latently moral pursuit.
In some things, how you get there matters. If you earn a million dollars by stealing other people's savings, that's very different from earning a million dollars by inventing a cure for malaria.
In other things, though—most things, perhaps—the way you get there is less relevant than what you're trying to achieve. What you hope to accomplish, and how you decide to do so.
By looking around, looking at the other people who're walking in similar directions, or toward similar goals, we may be able to not just better accomplish these same objectives, these collective pursuits, but we may also find ourselves opening up to new ideas about who is part of our in-group, and who isn't. We may find that just about anyone can, on the context of some shared goal, in some facet of life, seem very similar to us. Can be respectable by our standards, and us by theirs.
It'll still be a little while, I think, before we start to feel most of the temporal, negative consequences of our new technologies, our smartphones and social networks. These are innovations that are incredibly valuable, but we haven't updated our thinking, our norms, in such a way that we can use them optimally. Today, many of us cling to filler identities: slogans and platforms shouted by brands, be they political or corporate, that help us feel like we're a part of something, but which often fail to align with our actual ideals and values with adequate accuracy.
How you get there matters, but where you're going and actually getting there is also important.
Keep that in mind when you look out into the world seeking allies, camaraderie, and community."
This piece reminded me of an article I read about the ever diversifying ethnic groups composing the US population. I forget the details but the main idea was that in 40 or 50 years, no ethnic group will be in the majority (over 50%). Although partisan divides can and certainly do transcend ethnic groups, this will certainly make it harder for extreme groups such as conservative white supremacists to promote political leaders which they see as in support of their values, as we saw with the recent presidential election.
In any case, the aspect of his post that I enjoyed the most was the positive manner in which he viewed the current rise of both nationalism and right-wing extremism as a reaction to significant progress towards a more just, democratic, and understanding global community. I certainly hope he is right on this front, and that our ever advancing technological prowess enables the future free of walls that he described.
Photo is of an old Japanese bill for ¥5 that I found when going through my Grandfather's old photos from WWII. As I understand it, the set of bills, which also included French Francs, German Marks, and bills which appear to be Francs from Belgium and Luxembourg, was sent to my Grandfather by a friend after the war had ended. My host brother from Japan, Masaki, said that he thinks the Japanese bill was printed sometime between 1930-1946, which would make sense contextually. He also said "We used to read letters right to left. So here it says '日本銀行券' and it means 'the ticket of the Japanese bank'." The man on the bill is Sugawara no Michizane (845-903), a scholar, poet, and politician of the Heian period. The building is Kitano Tenman-gu Shinto Shrine (built in 947) in Kamigyo-ku, Kytoto.
What does it mean to feel safe? For many of us, we don't think about it until we've lost it. What I learned most from my work with these young women here in Nepal is that many women in this world do not feel safe in their daily lives, and worse yet, have never felt safe.
Our two groups (volunteers and Nepalese women) did a number of art games and exercises during the week structured to take us all deeper into and with ourselves as well as our relationship to our outside world. After each practice, we would share, in the large group of 25, or smaller groups. I think the greatest shock for me was the sharing on this topic. None of the young women who chose to share about the "safety" exercise felt safe in their world, and had never felt safe. They gave us pieces of their lives and their history, and through many tears, sobs, and much heartfelt stories, we followed each other through this very emotionally wrenching afternoon.
As women, none of us are truly safe until all of us feel safe in the world we live in. How can we each be proactive in creating and sustaining safety for ourselves, our families and our communities? What does "safety" mean to you?
Lately I perceive myself as the most relaxed man on earth. From my graduation day back in February, until roughly this July, I could sleep all day long without thinking about what I’m going to do next. I feel like I could finish things up later, one by one, so that I don’t get tangled around them. My activities were mainly revolved around my personal preparation concerned with my postgraduate studies. I was collecting datas for my thesis, booking a flight and accommodation, and taking care of Visa. All of them didn’t really take much time, as I approach them carefully, well planned, and one step at a time. But it all changed on July 27th.
It was the last day of Ramadhan. I just went to sleep after eating my Sahoor meal at 4 AM. I woke up at 10, only to found out that my scholarship guarantor, LPDP, sent each of the awardee in my group, Leadership Training batch 16 (Pelatihan Kepemimpinan angkatan 16/PK 16), an assignment. “Tugas 1 Pra PK 16”, the email said. The task required us to choose a chief through a perfect deliberation mechanism. Among 125 name on the list LPDP has, each one of us has to agree on one name, and one name only. LPDP did allow us to submitted at least three candidates, but there will be no voting process allowed. Each of the candidate has to supply a full support for those who leads the race, and the rest of the group had to do so as well.
I was kind of shocked actually, because that was the very first time that I have to pick a chief from a bunch of people I barely even knows. And also the fact that we are a large group. At that time, we consist of 125 people. Even though, after a process of listing, we were actually only consist of 112 people, but it was still a big amount of 111 people I’ve never met and know personally before. And to make things even “exhilirating”, LPDP only gave us three days to deliberate this thing. It means that by July 31st, we have to submit one name to be our chief.
And so the discussion begins. Moderated by Abie (Ikhsanul Habibie), Nita (Anita Rahmawati), and Oli (Annissa Aulia Handika), we first discussed about the criteria. Most of us agree on two things : availability and accessibility. What we meant by “availibility” was that our soon to be chief has to be available 24/7, everytime needed. He/she has to have some kind of willingness, integrity, and passion toward this program. And also – the most fundamental charactersitic – is that our chief has to genuinely bridge the interests of our group with LPDP. Furthermore, our chief has to be able to mobilize easily from time to time, because he/she will be required to go back and forth to do survey, or simply meet up with LPDP. This is what we meant by “accessibility”.
After we agreed on the criteria, moderators gave us time to voluntarily run as a candidate. The first name that bravely came up was Adi (Adi Chris DPP Bangun). He is an awardee from Medan, planning to go to University of Manchester, undertaking Master’s degree. The second one was Faisal (Ahmad Faisal), who offered us maturity and efficiency. He was the most senior among other candidates, and planning to take Master’s program in University of Southampton. The third candidate was Danu (Rizky Danurwindo). He was the one with the most glimmering CV, as he achieved so much during his years in college. He’s going to University College London, taking Management as his Master’s degree. And lastly, there was me. Initially I was both shy and scared. Shy because I had nothing to offer, and scared because I’m afraid I will let our group down. But after receiving many encouragements from our group, I decided to take this opportunity as a learning process. After this process, it’s campaign time.